Throughout the past few weeks, there has been a documentary put on for us to watch every thursday. I have been vigilant and made sure I attended each one despite not liking a few of them at all (bar one when I was ill). After these weeks I am glad that I went to all of them and have even sat through the ones i didn’t like at all. I am going to talk briefly about each one, quickly describe what they were about and if I liked them or not, then I am going to talk about how they were made and if I can take influence from these films when creating my documentary. As there are quite a few things to talk about I will try to keep it very basic.
Rip! Remix Manifesto
I loved Remix Manifesto. It enlightened me to many issues about the copy right laws we have around the world which up until watching te documentary, I didn’t even realise were issues. It has turned out to be the most conventional documentary in terms of what I usually watch.
The editing style and narrative in Remix Manifesto, although interesting and enjoyable, isn’t really something I’d use in my project. If you think of any popular documentary, it essentially uses the same style. Introduce a problem, explore that problem and why it is good or bad, repeat a few times, summary at the end of the film. Fairly standard. There were a few aspects of the editing and narrative which I enjoyed, such as someone in the documentary was shown the film, and it quickly played the whole film in a couple of seconds to show the passage of time which I thought was very clever. There was also an instance where manipulating the audio was used to further the story, they said they had used the music that they could use under the current ‘fair use’ act.
As I wanted to go for a rather unconventional editing style, there isn’t much I can take from Remix Manifesto that I can reflect in my work as it as I already described as pretty much the most basic of editing styles that I am already aware of. If I went for something like that I wouldn’t really be pushing myself out of my comfort zone, and in turn, wouldn’t really learn anything.
Sans Soleil
Sans Soleil was a very challenging film to watch, at first I couldn’t make much sense of it and thought it was just utter nonsense, but I did manage to sit through it, which is more that a lot of other people did! In the end I am glad I did sit through it as it exposed me to a piece of work I am not familiar with and have never been exposed to before, but I would not say that I enjoyed it.
The narrative in Sans Soleil is incredibly bizarre, from what I understood it was a woman reading a man’s letters or diary about his thoughts about things when he was travelling around the world, and the man appeared to have some kind of mental problem or was just completely insane, as the items in the film were hardly coherent, followed no narrative that was easily understandable and seemed a bit too focused on bizarre detail at some point, a bit like how someone with autism would concentrate on extreme details.
As much as I want to say that Sans Soleil is a bunch trash that doesn’t have anything good about it, that is not the case. The film has actually helped me in many ways, it sort of introduced me to an unconventional style of narrative and editing, and since my documentary has developed into something arguably unconventional, it has had more of an effect on me than I thought it would.
The Arbor
The Arbor was the most interesting film for me and taught me the most about how different Documentary’s can be from the plain standard that we see every week on BBC 2. Although for the most part it was entertaining, I felt that it could have been edited a little better as it started to feel a little dragged.
The way The Arbor was put together made it feel more like a drama than a documentary. Actors were used to mime as actual people’s interview voice recording’s were played over the top. I thought this was very impressive, and it gave the film a very cinematic look and feel, as a lot of the stuff was set up rather than observing real life, but still kept the element of reality with the voice overs.
After first viewing of The Arbor, I wanted to make something along the same lines as I thought the combination of drama and documentary was fantastic. It was just the realisation of the massive amount of work that would need to be put into it, and the huge amount of content that would needed to be recorded before even getting an actor to do the voice over, it just wouldn’t be suited for a three-minute project, although I would like to make something similar in the future.
Burden of Dreams
Burden of Dreams was a great film, although after two hours Herzog’s thick accent grinds on you, it is an inspirational film about never giving up on your dreams, despite however ridiculous they are.
The film didn’t offer much in terms of a new development in editing and narrative style, it was fairly plain and it didn’t offer much of an interesting editing style, at some points the film was a bit boring and stale and was barely kept alive by the entertaining character of Herzog.
The only thing that I can gain from this film is that a documentary absolutely needs a message, and an interesting character. I think these are the two most important things that need to be used in all documentary’s, as without these two vital things the film would have sent me straight to sleep, as there would have been nothing to keep me invested.
Grey Gardens
Grey Gardens was probably my least favourite of all the films that I have watched. Although it had two interesting characters, for the most part I just wasn’t committed to the film, it just didn’t seem to go anywhere and made for quite a boring watch.
The film was in the observatory mode, which before seeing Grey Gardens I thought it was the mode I would like to create my documentary, I changed my mind completely. Things in the observatory mode need to be really well in order to create a film that is entertaining, Grey Gardens just wasn’t entertaining for me, and it put me off completely.
The main thing I can take from Grey Gardens is how not to make a film. I know that sounds a bit ridiculous because who am I to slate a film that is popular and has had success, but I mean it in a way of, I personally didn’t like the film at all, and if I were to try to do something similar I wouldn’t like what I was doing and the end result would turn out to be not very good at all.